ABSTRACT
The sudden onset of the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic required agile development of standards and efficient validation of assays to assess prevalence of infection as well as immune responses to infection and vaccination. Leveraging their experience in HPV serology and standards, the Vaccine, Immunity and Cancer Directorate (VICD) at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNCLR) pivoted to address this unmet need in SARS-Co-V2 serology clinical testing and research. This standardization effort required the collection and processing of large volumes of blood from SARS-Co-V2 infected and uninfected individuals into serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Collaborations with specimen collection sites across the United States were established. Following qualification for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM levels in independent laboratories, VICD assembled reference evaluation panels, which were used to assist the FDA's performance evaluation of commercial assays submitted for EUA approval. To date, 185 different shipments of the standard or validation panel have been sent to both domestic and international labs. These materials are also available to the SARS-CoV-2 serology community for assay calibration and performance evaluation which greatly facilitates assay data harmonization. In addition, the NCI Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was born from this initiative and expertise, resulting in the establishment of Capacity Building Centers (CBCs) for sample collection from different healthy, cancer and immunocompromised cohorts at Mount Sinai, Arizona State University, the University of Minnesota, and Northwell Feinstein. The NCI and FNLCR simultaneously collaborated to develop a network of investigators focused on advancing research on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination among diverse and vulnerable populations, including cancer patients. Their research has resulted in over 326 peer-reviewed publications. The CBC's have enrolled patients in longitudinal studies, resulting in a centralized collection of annotated, well characterized serum, PBMCs and clinical data. Numerous cancer cohorts, but predominantly Multiple Myeloma, are included. Furthermore, technology development was supported at the CBC's. Based upon this success, the VICD in collaboration with NCI is pursuing an even more innovative effort in pandemic preparedness to establish a Center for Serology and Data Emergency Preparedness (CESDEP);a global network able to activate and pivot to address pandemic-level threats, while continuing to expand the development of immunological assays that can inform clinical decisions for cancer and other immunocompromised patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cancer patients have a high risk of severe COVID-19 and complications from it. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the conduction of clinical trials (CTs), there is a scarcity of data on CT participation among cancer patients. We aimed to describe the level of participation in a COVID-19 CT, willingness to participate, as well as trust in sources of information for CTs among persons with and without a previous cancer diagnosis in Puerto Rico. Method(s): Data collected from November 2021 to March 2022 from two cross-sectional studies were merged and used for analysis. Informed consent, telephone, face-to-face, and online interviews were conducted among participants >=18 years old living in Puerto Rico (n=987). Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis (Fisher's exact text and chi-squared test) was done to describe the outcomes of interest, overall and by cancer status. Result(s): Mean age of participants was 41+/-15.5 years. Most participants were women (71.3%), with an educational level greater than high school (89.5%) and with an annual family income below $20,000 (75.1%). Overall, 4.4% of participants (n=43) reported history of cancer diagnosis. Only 1.8% of the population reported to have participated in a COVID-19 CT to receive either a treatment or vaccine;stratifying by cancer, none of the cancer patients had participated in a COVID-19 CT, and only 1.9% of non-cancer patients participated. While 37.0% of the participants indicated being very willing to sign up for a CT assessing COVID-19 treatment, willingness was higher in cancer patients (55.8%) than among participants without cancer (36.1%). Regarding trust in sources of information for CTs, the level of trust ("a great deal/a fair amount") was higher for their physicians (87.6%), researchers (87.0%), the National Institute of Health (86.7%), their local clinics (82.9%), and a university hospital (82.7%), while it was lower for a pharmaceutical company (64.0%), and for friend, relative, or community leader (37.6%);no differences were observed by cancer status. Conclusion(s): While participation in COVID-19 CTs was extremely low in the study population, the willingness to participate was higher among cancer patients. Education on CTs and their availability are necessary to increase participation in this understudied group. Such efforts will enhance the representation of Hispanic and vulnerable populations, such as cancer patients, on COVID-19 CTs, and thus proper generalizability of study findings in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To estimate the public health impact of COVID-19 booster vaccination in the UK during Omicron predominance, and to explore the impact in counterfactual scenarios with different booster eligibility or uptake. Method(s): A dynamic transmission model was developed to compare public health outcomes for actual and hypothetical UK Spring and Autumn 2022 booster programs. Outcomes were projected over an extended time horizon from April 2022-April 2023, assuming continued Omicron predominance as in Jan-Mar 2022. Health outcomes included averted cases, hospitalizations, long COVID cases, and deaths. NHS resource use outcomes were averted general ward and intensive care unit bed days and general practitioner visits. Patient productivity loss outcomes considered productive days lost for those in and outside the paid work force. Analyses used publicly available data. Result(s): Model output suggested that actual Spring and Autumn 2022 programs, which offered boosters to older adults and vulnerable populations, would avert approximately 716,000 hospitalizations, 1.9M long COVID cases and 125,000 deaths compared to not offering boosters in Spring and Autumn 2022. In a scenario that broadened eligibility to individuals aged >=5 years, an estimated 1.6M hospitalizations, 8.3M long COVID cases, and 222,000 deaths were averted. A scenario assuming broadened eligibility and increased uptake produced the greatest benefit among scenarios analyzed: 1.6M hospitalizations, 9.2M long COVID cases, and 228,000 deaths averted;and 953M productive days saved. Scenarios offering boosters only to high-risk individuals (aged >=5 years) were also estimated to improve benefit relative to actual programs. High-risk-only programs assuming increased uptake provided about half to two-thirds of the benefit estimated for programs assuming broadened eligibility and increased uptake. Conclusion(s): UK booster vaccination programs were estimated to provide substantial benefit to public health during Omicron predominance. Public health benefits could be maximized by broadening booster eligibility to younger age groups and increasing uptake.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The public's stated preference for public health and social measures (PHSMs), and levels of pandemic fatigue are insufficiently fixed. We aim to quantify the public's preferences for varied PHSMs, and measure population's pandemic fatigue. Method(s): We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide sampling, survey-based experiment to assess public preference for and attitudes towards PHSMs. A set of psychometric scales, specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic fatigue scale (CPFS), was used to screen fatigue levels in the respondents. The multinomial logit model (MNL) and latent class model (LCM) were utilized for choice tasks analysis, and Mann-Whitney tests were used for CPFS statistical analysis. Result(s): There were 689 respondents, who completed the survey, and were included in the study after quality control. The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents attached the greatest importance to the risk of COVID-19 infection within three months (45.53%), followed by loss of income within three months (30.69%). Vulnerable populations (lower-income and older respondents) are more sensitive to the risk of infection, and younger respondents are more sensitive to income loss and prefer non-suspension of socialization and transportation. Migrants, and respondents with a higher level of fatigue, have less acceptance of the mandatory booster vaccination and suspension of transportation. Additionally, a higher fatigue level was observed in females, younger respondents, migrants, and relatively lower-income respondents. Conclusion(s): Fatigue and fear of COVID-19 infection contributed to the public's mental health problem. Hence, at the late-stage pandemic, policymakers should consider reducing people's mental burden via relieving people's fear of infection when PHSMs are being relaxed. And this also provides insights for the outbreaks' PHSMs implementation in the future.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 epidemic has caused serious and long-lasting health and social harm. Vaccination is considered as the most effective way to prevent the COVID-19 epidemic. Patients with mental disorders are at high risk of COVID-19 infection who are in urgent need to get protection. However, due to the particularity of their conditions, whether these patients should be vaccinated has become a tough issue that obsesses doctors, patients with mental disorders, and their families. In light of this issue, this article provides expert advice on the safety, legal and ethical issues of vaccination for patients with mental disorders to regulate the vaccination of these vulnerable populations against COVID-19.Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Psychiatry. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To identify and describe the risk factors that increase susceptibility in older adults to infection by SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19). Material(s) and Method(s): Descriptive, cross-sectional study in adults over 60 years, patients with a positive result (RT-PCR) were analysed to detect SARS-CoV-2. The study was carried out from May 17 to July 21, 2020. A multiple logistic regression model was used to analyse the risk factors of the study population. Result(s): 102 older adults were included with a mean age of 82.5 +/- 8.8 years, 55 (54%) were positive and 47 (46%) were negative. When analysing the risk factors related to higher mortality coupled with Covid-19 infection, the statistically significant variable was frailty, with an OR of 11.6 in frail adults compared to robust individuals (p-value = 0.024.) Conclusion(s): In the vulnerable population, risk factors must be identified and treated, but above all, such factors must be prevented in advance;early detection, isolation, effective treatment must be carried out as well as follow-up of contacts and prevention of the spread of the new virus to reduce mortality in vulnerable groups.Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Medica del Hospital General de Mexico. Published by Permanyer.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has created many complications in today's world. It has negatively impacted the lives of many people and emphasized the need for a better health system everywhere. COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease, and a high proportion of people have lost their lives due to this pandemic. This situation enables us to dig deeper into mortality records and find meaningful patterns to save many lives in future. Based on the article from the New Indian Express (published on January 19, 2021), a whopping 82% of people who died of COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu had comorbidities, while 63 percent of people who died of the disease were above the age of 60, as per data from the Health Department. The data, part of a presentation shown to Union Health Minister Harsh Vardhan, show that of the 12,200 deaths till January 7, as many as 10,118 patients had comorbidities, and 7613 were aged above 60. A total of 3924 people (32%) were aged between 41 and 60. Compared to the 1st wave of COVID-19, the 2nd wave had a high mortality rate. Therefore, it is important to find meaningful insights from the mortality records of COVID-19 patients to know the most vulnerable population and to decide on comprehensive treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic had an inequitable and disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, reversing decades of progress toward healthy populations and poverty alleviation. This study examines various programmatic tools and policy measures used by governments to support vulnerable populations during the pandemic. A comparative case study of 15 countries representing all World Health Organization's regions offers a comprehensive picture of countries with varying income statuses, health system arrangements and COVID-19 public health measures. Through a systematic desk review and key informant interviews, we report a spectrum of mitigation strategies deployed in these countries to address five major types of vulnerabilities (health, economic, social, institutional and communicative). We found a multitude of strategies that supported vulnerable populations such as migrant workers, sex workers, prisoners, older persons and school-going children. Prioritising vulnerable populations during the early phase of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, direct financial subsidies and food assistance programmes were the most common measures reported. Additionally, framing public health information and implementing culturally sensitive health promotion interventions helped bridge the communication barriers in certain instances. However, these measures remain insufficient to protect vulnerable populations comprehensively. Our findings point to the need to expand fiscal space for health, enlarge healthcare coverage, incorporate equity principles in all policies, leverage technology, multi-stakeholder co-production of policies and tailored community engagement mechanisms.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Equity , Child , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Poverty , Public Health , Vulnerable PopulationsABSTRACT
Historical data suggest that when a severe tropical storm or hurricane impacts a community, the vulnerable segment of the population suffers the most severe consequences. With an increased aging population, it is crucial to understand how vulnerability alters evacuation behavior. Emergent variables such as fear of COVID-19 require additional exploration. People afraid of COVID-19 exposure may refuse to evacuate, exposing themselves unnecessarily. Differentiation is critical to evacuation logistics since it is needed to determine what proportion would stay in a local shelter, public or other, rather than evacuating or staying in their home and guide the logistics resource allocation process. This research uses data from a web and phone survey conducted in the Hampton Roads area of U.S. Virginia, with 2,200 valid responses to analyze the influence of social and demographic vulnerability factors and risk perception on evacuation decisions. This research contributes to the existing literature by developing a multinomial order logit model based on vulnerability factors and intended evacuation decisions, including staying at home, looking for a shelter, or leaving the Hampton Roads area. Findings show that race and risk perception are the variables that influence the decision-making process the most. Fear of COVID-19 transmission is also associated with an increased likelihood of leaving homes during evacuation. The variations in findings from previous studies are discussed regarding their implications for logistics emergency managers.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The 2-minute-step test (2MST) is a face-to-face (F2F) measure used to clinically evaluate aerobic capacity in adults. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to assess cardiovascular health in a virtual environment became evident. The 2MST is amenable to being performed in a virtual environment due to low space requirements, simple instructions, and the ability to visually count step performance through a remote visual setup. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in performance on the 2MST when administered virtually compared with F2F. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: 28 healthy adults aged 18-35 were recruited. Subjects were screened to determine eligibility and scheduled for a practice session in both test environments. Exclusion criterion included balance impairments, cardiopulmonary conditions, and pain/recent surgeries that would adversely impact stepping performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects performed the 2MST virtually via Zoom platform and F2F on two separate days within 1 week of each other in a counterbalanced order. The primary outcome measure was total number of steps with the right leg to the marked height in both testing sessions. Heart rate was measured prior to performance and immediately upon test completion on both days. Group differences were analyzed using twotailed paired t-tests. RESULT(S): 25 adults (mean age = 24.0 years, 9males, 16 females) completed both sessions. Three subjects were not able to complete both tests and were excluded from analysis. There is no significant difference in mean number of steps performed F2F (M=108.6, SD=11.5) and virtual (M=109.2, SD=15.1);t(24)= .359, p = .7227. The average of the difference in steps between F2F and the virtual environment was <1 step (0.6). Change in heart rate (bpm) was not significantly different in the second test (M=50.4, SD=24.8) compared with the first test (M=46.7, SD=23.6) suggesting similar exertion in both test environments;t(23)=1.0288, p= .3143. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings indicate 2MST performance in healthy adults aged 18-35 is not significantly different when administered via Zoom compared with F2F. This suggests the 2MST may be an effective tool, if a visual virtual option such as Zoom or Facetime, is available when assessing aerobic capacity remotely. Limitations of the study include generalizability to other age groups is currently unknown and the ability of subjects to independently set up the test remotely was not assessed. As in all virtual assessments, clinical reasoning guides which patients are appropriate to perform outcome measures safely, if skilled assistance in not available. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A valid tool to assess aerobic capacity in a virtual environment can improve patient care, improve access to physical activity interventions and improve health outcomes. Vulnerable populations, such as cancer survivors, who need virtual options for ongoing care will benefit from assessment tools that are adaptable and valid in virtual settings.
ABSTRACT
The current new coronavirus pandemic has highlighted the importance of taking into consideration population groups particularly at risk of contracting Covid-19 disease or developing severe forms of the disease. The medical literature, the press and the authorities have thus stepped up the use of the expression <<vulnerable populations>> in recent weeks to refer to it. However, behind this general expression there are diverse but often interdependent realities whose specific consideration and understanding seem essential for the effective management of the epidemic and its health and socioeconomic consequences.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Early diagnosis of COVID-19 is key to prevent severe cases and poor outcomes in vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and people living with HIV or infected with tuberculosis (TB). The feasibility of integration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic testing (Ag-RDT) into maternal neonatal, and child Health (MNCH);HIV;and TB clinics is unknown. Method(s): We analyzed data from a SARS-CoV-2 screen and test program implemented in 50 health facilities (25 in Kenya and 25 in Cameroon), integrating SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV, and TB clinics between May and October 2022. Clients aged two and older attending MNCH, HIV, and TB clinics were offered SARS-CoV-2 screening, and those eligible were tested using SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT. Routine SARS-CoV-2 program data were captured through dedicated paper forms in Cameroon or an electronic medical record (EMR) interface in Kenya and transferred to a database for analysis. We estimated the proportion of clients screened and tested and the SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates. Result(s): Overall, 527,184 attendee visits were reported in Cameroon (282,404) and Kenya (244,780), with screening for COVID-19 symptoms and exposure performed in 256,033 (48.5%) with substantive variations between countries (62.6% in Cameroon and 32.4% in Kenya). Among the 256,033 screened, 19,058 (7.4%) were eligible for testing (9.0% in Cameroon and 3.9% in Kenya), of whom 12,925 (67.8%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 with substantial variation in testing rates between countries (61.9% in Cameroon and 97.9% in Kenya) and clinics (59.9% in MNCH, 68.7% in HIV, and 92.8% in TB clinics). A total of 390 (3.0%) positive tests were identified (329 (3.3%) in Cameroon and 61 (2.0%) in Kenya). The estimated case detection rate was 1.26 (95% CI=0.76-1.75) per 1,000 attendee visits in Cameroon and 0.49 (95% CI=0.12-0.86) per 1,000 attendee visits in Kenya. Country integration strategy, facility level, setting, and clinic were independently associated with screening (Table 1) and testing. Conclusion(s): Integration of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in HIV, TB, and MNCH clinics was feasible in both countries despite challenges with low screening rates in Kenya and low testing rates in Cameroon. Decentralization of SARS-CoV-2 testing at different facility clinics allowed detection of SARS-CoV-2 cases among vulnerable populations. Integration strategies should consider facility settings (rural compared to urban) and additional human resources in high volume facilities to improve screening and testing rates.
ABSTRACT
Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) may be at a greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 due to socio-structural inequities, high-risk behaviors and comorbidities;however, PWID have been underrepresented in case-based surveillance due to lower access to testing. We characterize temporal trends and correlates of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among a community-based sample of current and former PWID. Method(s): A cross-sectional study was conducted among participants in the AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience (ALIVE) study-a community-based cohort of adults with a history of injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland. Participants' first serum sample collected at routine study visits between December 2020 and July 2022 was assayed for antibodies to the nucleocapsid (N) (past infection) and spike-1 (S) (past infection and/or vaccination) proteins using the MSD V-Plex Panel 2 IgG SARS-CoV-2 assay. For each correlate, we estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) via separate Poisson regression models adjusted for calendar time, age, sex and race. Result(s): Of 561 participants, the median age was 59 years (range=28-77), 35% were female, 84% were Black, 36% were living with HIV (97% on ART), and 55% had received >=1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Overall, anti-N and anti-S prevalence was 26% and 63%, respectively. Prevalence of anti-N increased from 23% to 40% between December 2020-May 2021 and December 2021-July 2022, with greater increases in the prevalence of anti-S from 34% to 86% over the same period (Figure). Being employed (PR=1.53 [95%CI=1.11-2.11]) and never being married (PR=1.40 [0.99-1.99]) were associated with a higher prevalence of anti-N, while female sex (PR=0.75 [0.55-1.02]) and a history of cancer (PR=0.40 [0.17-0.90]) were associated with a lower prevalence of anti-N. Younger age, female sex (PR=0.90 [0.80-1.02]), and homelessness (PR=0.78 [0.60-0.99]) were associated with a lower prevalence of anti-S. Although HIV infection was not associated with anti-N, it was associated with a higher prevalence of anti-S (PR=1.13 [1.02-1.27]). Substance use was not associated with anti-N or anti-S. Conclusion(s): Anti-N and anti-S levels increased over time, suggesting cumulative increases in SARS-CoV-2 incidence of infection and vaccination among PWID;however, disparities in seroprevalence remain. Younger and female PWID and those experiencing homelessness were less likely to be anti-S positive, suggesting programs should aim to improve vaccination coverage in such vulnerable populations.
ABSTRACT
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) hit the news headlines as a pandemic bound to affect millions of people worldwide, and news media took responsibility to warn people, country heads, businesses, and private and non-governmental institutions about the virus. However, stories swirling on social media platforms about the origin and nature of COVID-19 and questionable reporting by established news networks have left the public questioning the integrity of the natural causes of the virus, how it spreads, what the facts are, how they are communicated, and whether treatment standards equate the hoopla about the genesis of the "pandemic." This chapter reviews various narratives about the mystification and demystification of COVID-19. It attempts to depart from the premise that the media frames how people consume and use news and examines the media's character (operations). The chapter then suggests how stakeholders should manage news flows on COVID-19, how consumers should screen news, and how journalists should process and report COVID-19. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. They may have lower SARS-CoV-2-directed antibody levels due to protein loss from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a result of preparative regimen-related toxicity and graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). In fact, previous studies suggested that GI GVHD or diarrhea from other etiologies were associated with a reduction in the half-life of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Hence, understanding the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of mAbs targeting SARS-CoV-2 in this vulnerable population is critical for dose-selection and predicting the duration of protection against COVID-19. This analysis aims to use a population pharmacokinetics (popPK) approach to evaluate the PK of sotrovimab and the effect of covariates in HCT recipients. In a Phase I trial (COVIDMAB), all participants received 500 mg sotrovimab IV prophylactically within one week prior to starting transplant conditioning. Sotrovimab serum concentrations were determined weekly for up to 12 weeks in autologous (n=5) and allogeneic (n=15) HCT recipients (129 observations). Sotrovimb PK and the effect of covariates were analyzed using popPK modeling in NONMEM (version 7.4). GVHD and diarrhea severity data were collected weekly via survey and included as time-dependent covariates during the covariate screening process. The final PK model with covariates was validated using simulation-based validation and goodness of fit plots. PK data were compared to non-transplant patients from 1891 patients with COVID-19 in COMET-ICE, COMET-PEAK, BLAZE-4, and COMET-TAIL and 38 healthy individuals enrolled in GlaxoSmithKline Pharma Study 217653. A two-compartment model best described sotrovimab PK in HCT recipients. In comparison to non-transplant patients, sotrovimab clearance (CL) was 14.0% higher in HCT recipients. Weight was a significant covariate on sotrovimab CL and (Figure Presented) volume of distribution in the central compartment (V2). With every 10 kg increase in body weight, sotrovimab CL and V2 were estimated to increase by 9.5% and 5.5%, respectively. Diarrhea severity was also a significant covariate on sotrovimab CL. HCT recipients with grade 3 diarrhea showed an increase in CL by 1.5-fold compared to those without diarrhea. Based on popPK analyses, sotrovimab CL was higher in HCT recipients compared to non-transplant patients. Higher bodyweight as well as diarrhea resulted in increased sotrovimab CL. There were only 3 patients with GI GVHD, and larger studies are needed to determine whether diarrhea due to GI GVHD or conditioning toxicity was responsible for the observed increase in sotrovimab CL. Further validation of these findings in a larger number of HCT recipients is also warranted to help optimize mAb dosing for COVID-19 prophylaxis and determine whether presence of large-volume diarrhea may require intensified dosing strategiesCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: Most programs use a screen and test strategy to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection, but this strategy does not identify individuals with asymptomatic infection. We determined the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates in a test-all model compared to the standard screen-and-test model in Kenya and Cameroon. Method(s): A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 20 health facilities between May-October 2022. In each country, 5 facilities were randomized to test all (testing offered regardless of screening outcome) or screen and test (testing offered if screened positive) arms. Additional staff were hired to support implementation of the two models in Kenya (K) and the test all model in Cameroon (C). Clients age>2 years attending HIV, TB and MNCH clinics were tested using SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests. We estimated case detection rates (CDR) with facility level weighted averages and used a weighted t-test with robust standard errors for between arm comparison. Result(s): Overall, 80,828 attendee visits were reported in the test-all arm (63,492 C and 17,336 K) and 71,254 attendee visits were reported in the screenand- test arm (56,589 C and 14,665 K). In the test-all arm, 42,325 (52.4%) were screened for COVID-19 symptoms (46.7% C and 73.2% K) and 21,536 (26.6%) were tested (29.2% C and 17.4% in Kenya) with a positivity rate of 1.4% (2.0% C and 1.1% K). In the screen-and-test arm, 48,314 (67.8%) were screened (72.8% C and 48.6% K), and 3,629 (7.5%) were eligible for testing (8.2% C and 3.7% K) - of those, 2,139 (58.9%) were tested (57.1% C and 82.4% K) with a positivity rate of 4.1% (3.4% C and 10% K). The estimated CDR was 3.59 (95% CI:1.55-5.64) per 1,000 attendee visits in the test-all arm and 1.46 (95% CI:0.60-2.32) per 1,000 attendee visits in the screen-and-test arm. Compared to the screen-and-test arm, the test-all arm had significantly higher COVID-19 CDR in MNCH clinics (3.57 vs.1.29, p=0.034). There were no significant differences in COVID-19 CDR between the two arms in HIV (4.20 vs.1.98, p=0.174) and TB (10.33 vs. 5.03, p=0.283) clinics, though the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was small. Conclusion(s): The test-all arm identified more SARS-CoV-2 cases than the routine screen-and-test model, despite overall low testing coverage. The test-all model should be considered in future epidemics to improve early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection among vulnerable populations, but effective implementation requires additional human resources to manage the clinic volumes. COVID-19 Case Detection Rates Per 1,000 Attendees: Comparison of Screen-and- Test and Test-All Arms.
ABSTRACT
Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 and severe disease but have low rates of COVID-19 testing and vaccination due to multilevel barriers. We partnered with a mobile syringe service program (SSP) in San Diego County, CA, to develop the theory-informed LinkUP intervention to increase COVID-19 testing and vaccination among PWID. Method(s): From March-June 2022, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT;ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05181657) to assess efficacy of LinkUP vs. a didactic attention-matched control condition in increasing COVID-19 testing uptake and acceptance of vaccination referrals. Based on Social Cognitive Theory, trained, SSP-hired peer counsellors delivered tailored education, motivational interviewing, and problem-solving and planning to the active LinkUP intervention arm. We referred eligible participants (PWID, >=18 years old, San Diego County residents without recent voluntary COVID-19 testing or fully vaccinated status) to mobile SSP sites that had been randomized by week to offer LinkUP or the control condition;all participants were then offered on-site rapid COVID-19 antigen testing and vaccination referrals. Our intent-to-treat analysis used Chi-square tests to compare intervention groups' outcomes and log-binomial regression to estimate preliminary intervention efficacy and explore potential moderation. Result(s): Among 150 participants, median age was 41 years, 33% identified as Latinx and 65% as male, 73% were experiencing homelessness, and 45% had prior mandatory COVID-19 testing. Overall, we only detected one SARS-CoV-2 case. However, more active intervention vs. control participants agreed to COVID-19 testing (77.3% vs. 22.7%;p< .001) and vaccine referrals (32.4% vs. 13.3%;p=0.006). Homelessness moderated intervention effects: LinkUP increased COVID-19 testing uptake more among participants experiencing homelessness (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.64;95% CI: 1.27-2.12) than those not experiencing homelessness (aRR: 1.25;95% CI: 0.99-1.56). Conclusion(s): Findings from this RCT support the efficacy of LinkUP in increasing COVID-19 testing and acceptance of vaccination referrals among PWID presenting at mobile SSP sites, particularly for those experiencing homelessness. This research underscores the significance of communityacademic partnerships when working with PWID and identifies a promising model that could be adapted to increase access to other underutilized vaccines in this vulnerable population.
ABSTRACT
Background: To inform future preventive measures including repeated vaccinations, we have searched for a clinically useful immune correlate of protection against fatal COVID-19 among nursing homes residents. Methods: We performed repeated capillary blood sampling with analysis of S-binding IgG in an open cohort of nursing home residents in Sweden. We analyzed immunological and registry data from 16 September 2021 to 31 August 2022 with follow-up of deaths to 30 September 2022. The study period included implementation of the 3rd and 4th mRNA monovalent vaccine doses and Omicron virus waves. Findings: A total of 3012 nursing home residents with median age 86 were enrolled. The 3rd mRNA dose elicited a 99-fold relative increase of S-binding IgG in blood and corresponding increase of neutralizing antibodies. The 4th mRNA vaccine dose boosted levels 3.8-fold. Half-life of S-binding IgG was 72 days. A total 528 residents acquired their first SARS-CoV-2 infection after the 3rd or the 4th vaccine dose and the associated 30-day mortality was 9.1%. We found no indication that levels of vaccine-induced antibodies protected against infection with Omicron VOCs. In contrast, the risk of death was inversely correlated to levels of S-directed IgG below the 20th percentile. The death risk plateaued at population average above the lower 35th percentile of S-binding IgG. Interpretation: In the absence of neutralizing antibodies that protect from infection, quantification of S-binding IgG post vaccination may be useful to identify the most vulnerable for fatal COVID-19 among the oldest and frailest. This information is of importance for future strategies to protect vulnerable populations against neutralization resistant variants of concern. Funding: Swedish Research Council, SciLifeLab via Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, VINNOVA. Swedish Healthcare Regions, and Erling Persson Foundation.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a socioeconomic crisis, increasing food insecurity. Government measures have not been enough, and the community has organized itself to solve its food needs. In Chile, the "Ollas Comunes" (OC) have re-emerged: self-managed social organizations whose purpose is to feed community members in a situation of hunger. The study aims to describe the characteristic elements of the operation of the OC in Chile during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study, which uses quantitative and qualitative data. Through an online form, information was collected from 117 OC nationwide. Result(s): On average, nine people work in the OC, with different tasks. The OC operated mainly three days a week in community spaces and in the more vulnerable neighborhoods. The volunteers recognized that the OC arose from a community need that the government could not attend to;the OC promoted social participation and helped the vulnerable population. Conclusion(s): This research could help develop public policies that consider these community organizations and their role in food insecurity and take advantage of the community capacity.Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Comunitaria. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Outcomes: 1. A better understanding of the benefits of embedded palliative care into a neuro surgery unit at a large academic hospital 2. An understanding of the financial impact related to embedding a palliative care APC into the neuro surgery unit at a large academic hospital Problem: Palliative care needs of patients admitted to neurology ICUs are often unmet. Patients with palliative care needs identified were more likely to die in an ICU setting or be transferred to the floor with comfort measures only. These patients were noted to have a longer length of stay. Because of the known benefits of palliative care, specifically, with this vulnerable population of patients, there was a desire to increase the palliative care presence on the neuro surgical service. Intervention(s): One APC palliative care position specific to the neuro ICU team was created. Responsibilities included symptom management, family support, medical decision making, managing conflicts over care goals, and disposition planning. Outcome(s): Outcomes included involvement in interdisciplinary rounds, increased donor opportunities, and increased billing by 28% in 2021. There was a 46% increase in palliative care consults from 2020 to 2021 and an increase in percentage of DNR/DNI orders obtained during admission from 2020 to 2021. An increase in deaths during hospitalization with active palliative care consults on comfort care was noted. Statistics were collected specific to mortality, ICU LOS, diagnosis, COVID status, social work involvement, as well as spiritual care involvement. Conclusion(s): Patients are seen earlier in their hospitalization and their medical wishes are now widely known and discussed by all interdisciplinary team members. The need for the involvement of the APC in these cases has only solidified with increased exposure to the palliative care team as consults increase. Patients are benefitting from the quality care being provided that now better aligns with their personal medical goals. Implications for nursing: There are many vulnerable patient populations for whom palliative care could be just as impactful;additional research should be completed to investigate further. Palliative care embedded on an ICU improves collaboration and increases exposure and understanding of the intent of palliative care.Copyright © 2023